Legal Opinion

(PC) Van Gessel v. Moore

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 25, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01478Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER ALLEN VAN GESSEL, 1:18-cv-01478-DAD-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE 13 vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS MOORE, ALTUIRE, AND BALLESIL ON 14 THOMAS MOORE, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL CLAIMS UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT AND 15 Defendants. MALPRACTICE CLAIMS UNDER THE FTCA, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS 16 AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE 17 TO STATE A CLAIM 18 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 19 20 21 I.…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API