Legal Opinion

Chappell v. F. A. D. Andrea Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1930No. 20139PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The brief for the defendant in error is so thoroughly in accord with our views that we are incorporating much of it in this opinion. Did the court err in its ruling on the demurrer as complained of in the exceptions pendente lite? To determine this, let us consider the pertinent portions of the contract alleged in the answer and the cross-bill to have been breached by the plaintiff. These are as follows: “1st. Said plaintiff did then and there agree with this defendant to furnish and sell him said radio sets, all fixtures and attachments thereto complete,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McCaw Manufacturing Co. v. Felder & RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Harrison & Garrett v. Wilson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Simpson & Harper v. Sanders & JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weill v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Parks v. Atlanta News Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Alexis Inc. v. WerbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Wedgewood Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Color-Set, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API