Legal Opinion
Adler v. Adler
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 9, 1950No. 17212PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
Special ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial complains that the court erred in striking four jurors from the panel. Following the initial questions as to relationship, counsel for the caveator suggested that, under the act (Ga. L. 1949, p. 1082), either side had the right to purge the jury by asking them certain questions designed to obtain a fair jury. The Court: “All right, go ahead.” Counsel for the caveator then asked, in effect, if named attorneys for the propounder testified, and they were lawyers of the jurors or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pulliam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Yarbrough v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Potter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Beasley v. BurtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Williams v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Bailey v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Canal Insurance Co. v. Winge Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Almond v. McCranieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Steverson v. Hosp. Auth. of Ware CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.