Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Burt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1946No. 15498PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) We deal first with the qualification of the trial judge. It is insisted that, while Blaekshear Bank was not a party to the proceedings, it had such a pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case that the trial judge should have disqualified himself on a motion made for that purpose. If disqualified, it was because of his relationship, within the prohibited degree, to one who had an interest in stock of Blaekshear Bank. It was not disputed that the wife of the judge owned, at the time of trial, an interest in stock of Blaekshear Bank. “No…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Central Georgia Power Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Tifton, Thomasville & Gulf Railway Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New York v. HuhnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Bryan v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. Worsham Bros. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Kilgore v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API