Legal Opinion

Pearlman v. W. O. King Lumber Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1939No. Gen. No. 40,729PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Plaintiffs brought suit to recover damages to their respective automobiles alleged to be caused by the defendants; the jury brought in a verdict for the defendants and plaintiffs appeal.

The statement of claim alleged the negligence of defendant Denton, as the driver of a truck belonging to defendant W. 0. King Lumber Company, and also alleged the negligent operation of a Ford auto driven by the defendant Chester H. Brown; that as the result of the negligent operation of the truck and the Ford auto, plaintiffs ’ autos were wrecked.

In an action for tort, the declaration charging two or more…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Linquist v. HodgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Barnes v. Danville Street Railway & Right Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bryne v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Davis v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Griffith v. v. A. Simrell & Son Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Millette v. RadostaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Thomas v. CagwinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  3. Capital Transit Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. People v. SampsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Krump v. Highlander Ice Cream Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API