Legal Opinion

Davis v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1928No. Docket No. 3520PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiffs had judgment for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff Nora Ellen Davis arising from an automobile collision between an automobile controlled and managed by the defendant, in which the said Nora Ellen Davis was riding, and a certain other automobile known as and called in the testimony the “Chevrolet.” The judgment also covered the costs and expenses incurred by the plaintiff George Davis. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

The complaint alleges and the answer admits that the defendant E. B. Brown during all the times mentioned in the complaint was doing business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Brown v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Morris v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Mansfield v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Annin v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Esponette v. WisemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  3. Zeigler v. RyanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. MarconiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Collins v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API