Legal Opinion
Daneshvar v. Graphic Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 15, 2007No. 06-3242PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
BOBBY R. BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Bijan Daneshvar, appearing pro se, appeals from the district court’s entry *311of judgment in favor of defendant Graphic Technology, Inc. (GTI), on his claims of discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I. Background
Mr. Daneshvar, who is Iranian, worked for GTI since 1988.1 GTI is in the printing business. Mr. Daneshvar’s precise job title is a matter of some contention between the parties, but…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Argo v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon, Takura Fujiwara, and Melinda Isabel FujiwaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stevens v. Water District One of Johnson CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Geismann v. AESTHETICARE, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- McKay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Alabama Municipal Workers Compensation Fund, Inc. v. P.R. Diamond Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
- A.L. v. PittsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.