Legal Opinion

United States v. Rhiger

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2003No. 01-2246PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Joel Rhiger appeals his conviction for conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §‘ 846 and for possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We affirm.

I

Prior to Mr. Rhiger’s arrest, federal drug agents observed him driving Carl Baker and another companion to several locations where Mr. Baker and the companion bought materials used to manufacture methamphetamine. Agents also learned that less than a week earlier, Mr. Rhiger had purchased ingredients used to make methamphetamine. The agents then…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Figueroa v. MazzaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Holder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United States v. AngelosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. NajarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API