Legal Opinion

Figueroa v. Mazza

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 3, 2016No. 14-4116-cvPublishedCited by 349 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:

We consider here whether defendants-appellees are, as the District Court determined, entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff-appellant’s claims for false arrest, excessive force, assault, failure to intervene, and unlawful entry. We conclude that defendants-appellees are entitled to the protection of qualified immunity with respect to the false arrest claims and that they did not use excessive force or commit an assault in arresting plaintiff-*94appellant. We also conclude, however, that the claims of failure to intervene and unlawful entry present…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by349 opinions

  1. United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  2. Clark v. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  3. Dettelis v. SharbaughCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. Lloyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Lennox v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020

344 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API