Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Rumisek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1960No. Docket 62, 63, 64, Calendar 48,215, 48,216, 48,217PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case * * relates to an owner’s statutory liability † for injuries occasioned by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle.

On December 25, 1953, Martin Rumisek was involved in an accident while driving an automobile he owned jointly with his wife. He was killed in the .accident, and his estate closed on May 10, 1954. On June 30, 1954, the plaintiffs, who had been injured in the accident, petitioned the probate court to reopen the estate, but in this effort they met the vigorous opposition of counsel and the petition was denied. On February 17,1956, they brought suit under the statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Mittelstadt v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Newberry v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Mull v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mull v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Calladine v. HYSTER COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Freed v. SalasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API