Legal Opinion
Bloom v. Good Humor Ice Cream Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 5, 1941No. [No. 26, January Term, 1941.]PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtForsythe, J.
The appeal is this case is from a judgment for costs, entered by the Baltimore City Court in favor of the appellees. The judgment was entered after the court had sustained a demurrer, without leave to amend, to the “First Amended Declaration.”
The facts upon which this action is based are stated in the amended declaration. It contains but one count, and is as follows:
“Leonard Bloom, an infant, by Hyman L. Bloom, his father, and next friend, sues The Good Humor Ice Cream Company of Baltimore, Maryland, a body corporate, and Adam C. Kearn.
“For that at the time hereinafter mentioned the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowman v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Holler v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Mayor of Baltimore v. TerioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Ottenheimer v. MolohanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Monumental Motor Tours, Inc. v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Willis E. Wilson, Rep., Estate of Tomikia Wilson v. Good Humor Corporation and David A. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.