Legal Opinion

Ottenheimer v. Molohan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1924PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AixiíINS, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

On August 9th, 1921, Harold S. Molohan, aged six .and a half years., the infant plaintiff in this case, was struck by the automobile of Bernard M. Ottenheimer, the defendant, on the Washington-Baltimore State Bead, near Cottage City, in Prince George’s County, Maryland. Suit was brought by the infant, by his father and next friend, against Otten-heimer, and a verdict rendered by a jury in favor of plaintiff for $950, on which judgment was entered. This appeal is from that judgment.

The only bill of exception is. to the ruling of the trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  2. McMahon v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Taxicab Co. of Balto. v. EmanuelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  4. Sullivan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Geiselman v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Miller v. GraffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  2. Bloom v. Good Humor Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. State, Use of Taylor v. BarllyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Cocco v. LissauCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  5. Dean v. RedmilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API