Legal Opinion

Cabral v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01316Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SERGIO CABRAL, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-01316 Plaintiff, v. (MEHALCHICK, J.) PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO LP, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Sergio Cabral (“Mr. Cabral”) brings this action on behalf of himself and those similarly situated against Penske Trucking OP LP (“Penske”). (Doc. 1). Cabral alleges Penske violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) 47 U.S.C. § 227(b) by leaving him and others a prerecorded voicecall without consent. (Doc. 1). The operative amended…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API