Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Scholes
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided April 11, 1949No. Nos. A-5288, A-5299PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, District Judge.
Motion to quash service of summons. Granted.
In these two cases the plaintiffs and the defendants are, respectively, identical. In 5288 the plaintiffs brought suit for breach of contract of employment, claiming wages in the sum of $12,105.36. It is alleged in the plaintiffs’ complaint that the contract of employment was made in the Territory of Alaska and that the defendants in entering into the contract, acted by and through the defendant Howard Scholes, one of the partners acting for the firm.
In 5289 the same plaintiffs have sued for false arrest and false imprisonment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Raffety v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Alaska S. S. Co. v. MullaneyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1949
- In re BernasconiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Temengil v. Trust Territory of the Pacific IslandsDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 1983