Legal Opinion

Van Winkle v. . Berger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSjeawell, J.

Tbe crux of tbe question posed by tbis appeal is whether, upon tbe above facts, Ella Bucbanan bad any vested and disposable interest in tbe principal of tbe trust fund which passed into tbe residuary estate upon her death without issue.

Without fully stating tbe arguments, tbe construction of tbe Berger will offered by the appellants in support of tbe affirmative presents tbe following rationale :

Under Article 5 of tbe will dealing with tbe disposition of tbe corpus of tbe trust fund, tbe proportionate part thereof tbe income of which was payable to Ella Bucbanan during her natural life, is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Coddington v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Harrell v. . HaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Latham v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Dyar v. DyarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Entwistle v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. BETTS BY AND THROUGH PARKER v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Armstrong Ex Rel. Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API