Gault v. Wiens
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion for a new trial.
The facts are as follows: About December 10, 1908, defendants executed three promissory notes of five hundred dollars each, payable one year after date to Henry J. Martens, who, on January 9, 1909, indorsed and delivered the same, with other notes amounting in all to thirty-four thousand dollars, to the Bank of Topeka, Topeka, Kansas, as collateral security for the payment of a note of sixteen thousand dollars made by him to said bank, which by its terms matured six months thereafter and which at maturity was renewed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McArthur v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Wingard v. BanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Latta v. TuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Davis v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Hoxie v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Half Moon Fruit & Produce Co. v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Johnson v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Traders Bank v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Haulman v. CrumalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.