Latta v. Tutton
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Hughes, Judge, The mortgage note referred to in the opinion, bore interest at the rate of eleven per cent per'annum, payable semi-annually. Further facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Claim and delivery of certain five bonds of the Linda Vista Irrigation District of the value of five hundred dollars each. Defendant denies f'he ownership of plaintiff and claims ownership in himself, and sets up the statute of limita*281tions. The pleadings are verified. The trial was by the court, and the findings of fact are: That plaintiff was the owner of the property on November 12, 1892, and ever since has been such owner as her separate property; that on the day last named W. C. Latta, husband of plaintiff, delivered the property to defendant as a pledge, with the knowledge and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Jacks v. BaldezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Grinbaum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Sacramento Bank v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Rose v. Dunk-Harbison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.