Legal Opinion
LiquidX Inc. v. Brooklawn Capital, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 2017No. 16cv5528PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Plaintiff LiquidX Inc. brings this declaratory judgment action against Defendants Brooklawn Capital LLC, Brooklawn Capital Fund LLC, and Brooklawn Capital Fund II, LP (collectively, “Brooklawn”), seeking a declaration that LiquidX is not the alter ego of non-party The Receivables Exchange (“TRE”) and that Brooklawn cannot compel LiquidX to join a Louisiana arbitration proceeding between Brooklawn and TRE.
In September 2016, this Court entered an order enjoining the arbitrator from deciding the question of whether LiquidX is the alter ego of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Walkovszky v. CarltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Green v. Champion Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mirage Entm't, Inc. v. FEG Entretenimientos S.A.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Blumberg v. RoneyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Iconoclast Advisors, LLC v. GoBig Solar, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- McCaffrey v. Gatekeeper USA, IncDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- National Collegiate v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.