Heiselt v. Brown
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard
The action is by the same plaintiff, and, with the exception that a certain surety company — only incidentally involved in any event, a defendant there, but not here— against the same defendants as in Heiselt, Inc. v. Brown, 108 Colo. 562, 120 P. (2d) 644. The case involves the same situation, and in setting it forth in the pleadings, similar allegations attend. In each instance there was prayer for legal and equitable relief. In the first case general demurrers to the complaint challenging the sufficiency of the facts to state a cause of action, were sustained below, Based thereon, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Custer v. KroegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Smith v. CowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- L. H. Heiselt, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eadon v. ReulerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Heron v. City of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. GinsbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Heron v. City of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958