Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Ginsberg

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 10, 1955No. 17391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

In the trial court defendant in error was plaintiff and plaintiff in error was defendant. We will refer to the parties las they there appeared, or by name.

The record discloses these essential facts: Bob Caldwell, doing business as Bob’s Auto Sales, was a used-automobile dealer. He had certain dealings with Ginsberg who instituted an action numbered A-62736 in the Denver District Court against Caldwell and defendant Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, based on alleged fraud and misrepresentation on the part of Caldwell, which in essence were that Caldwell fraudulently withheld from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Newby v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Smith v. CowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Schroers v. FiskSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Heiselt v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D. A. C. Uranium Co. v. BentonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API