Legal Opinion
Heron v. City of Denver
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1958No. 5673PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants by the United States District Court of Colorado upon the ground that the issues involved had been previously adjudicated in the Courts of the State of Colorado.
The plaintiff Heron, who was not a licensed architect, instituted this action alleging that he was a registered professional engineer, licensed to practice engineering in Colorado; that Section 301, Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1952, City and County of Denver, Colorado,1 which *120provided that only architects licensed by the State of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Brinkley v. HassigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Henderson v. United States Radiator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Vinson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Maxine G. EverettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- A. H. Fox v. Connecticut Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Fox v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Heron v. City of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958