Chisholm v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This workmen’s compensation case presents the question whether the 30-day time for appeal from a referee’s order (ORS 656.289) begins to run from the date of the original order or from the date of an amendment to the first order made by the referee within the original 30-day period.
The Workmen’s Compensation Board determined that the period ran from the date of the original order and thus it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. The circuit court on appeal from the board order reversed the board and held that the appeal period ran from the date of the correcting order. The state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winters v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Crow v. Junior BootshopsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Mendenhall v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Hammond v. ALBINA ENGINE & MACHINE WORKS, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Ransom v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Clatsop Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Farmers Insurance Group v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Callahan v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Oklahoma City Public Schools, Own Risk v. StrunkCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Chisholm v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.