Legal Opinion

Ransom v. United States National Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 1972No. 369-583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

The opinion of the trial judge adequately states and correctly decides the issue on this appeal.

“The employer through its carrier has moved to dismiss this appeal for the reason that it was not commenced within 30 days from the date of mailing copies of the order of the Board.
“The facts are clear:
“1. The order of the Board was mailed to the parties May 10, 1971.
“2. Notice of appeal to the Circuit Court was received in the clerk’s office May 13, 1971.
“3. The notice reflects that service thereof was made upon claimant, the employer, the insurer and the employer’s attorney on May 12, 1971.
“4.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stroh v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Emanuel HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Chisholm v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Zandbergen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Argonaut Insurance v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. In Re RansomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API