Legal Opinion

Castelli v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1960No. Appeal, No. 79PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Bell,

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit. It is well settled that a nonsuit can be entered only in a clear case and that in considering the *136entry or tlie removal or the reversal of a nonsuit the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and she must be given the benefit of every reasonable inference of fact arising therefrom and any conflict in the evidence must be resolved in her favor: Borzik v. Miller, 399 Pa. 293, 159 A. 2d 741; Freund v. Huster, 397 Pa. 652, 156 A. 2d 534; Seburn v. Luzerne & Carbon County Motor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. CARLSON v. A. & P. Corrugated Box Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Borzik v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Seburn v. Luzerne & Carbon County Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Freund v. HusterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Repyneck v. TarantinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Engle v. SpinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Semet v. Andorra Nurseries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Steiner v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API