Legal Opinion

Matias v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 28, 1990No. 596-88CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

The plaintiff's complaint seeks military back pay, correction of his military records by voiding his court-martial conviction, attorney’s fees and costs, and other relief. In response, the defendant initially filed a motion to dismiss, alleging the Court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Thereafter, both parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed herein, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment is granted.

Factual and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tindle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. James R. Matias v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Rice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Ultimo v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Reed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API