Legal Opinion

Kopitske v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1999No. B126908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, Acting P. J.

An injured worker receives vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA). Her employer unreasonably delays paying advances against permanent disability (PDA) per Labor Code section 139.5. In this case of first impression, we hold that the 10 percent penalty under Labor Code section 5814 should be assessed against permanent disability (PD).

Victoria Kopitske (Kopitske) petitions for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denying reconsideration of its ruling that the penalty assessed for unreasonable delay in paying PDA should…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Avalon Bay Foods v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kopitske v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.California Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API