Kopitske v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, Acting P. J.
An injured worker receives vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA). Her employer unreasonably delays paying advances against permanent disability (PDA) per Labor Code section 139.5. In this case of first impression, we hold that the 10 percent penalty under Labor Code section 5814 should be assessed against permanent disability (PD).
Victoria Kopitske (Kopitske) petitions for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denying reconsideration of its ruling that the penalty assessed for unreasonable delay in paying PDA should…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Avalon Bay Foods v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kopitske v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.California Court of Appeal · 1999