Legal Opinion

Kopitske v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1999No. B126908Published

1Opinion of the Court

88 Cal.Rptr.2d 216 (1999)

74 Cal.App.4th 623

Victoria KOPITSKE, Petitioner,

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and Safeco Insurance Company, Respondents.

No. B126908.

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Six.

August 24, 1999.

Review Denied November 17, 1999.[*]

Kathleen M. Stout, Santa Barbara, and Julie A. Bienefeld, for Petitioner.

Law offices of Charles B. Crowder, Seattle, WA, and Terry L. Smith, Freeland, WA, for Respondent Safeco Insurance Company.

No appearance for Respondent Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.

GILBERT, Acting P.J.

An injured worker receives vocational rehabilitation…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API