Legal Opinion

Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1993No. S022239PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

When a worker suffers an industrial injury, the employer is required by law to provide workers’ compensation benefits. This obligation to provide benefits arises shortly after the injury has been incurred. When, upon a worker’s application, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) issues an order or award, it includes benefits that the employer already has or should have paid, as well as benefits the employer is to pay in the future. (See, e.g., Lab. Code, §§ 4600, 4650; all further statutory citations are to the Labor Code.) If the employer has unreasonably delayed or…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Larson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Boehm & Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Avalon Bay Foods v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Roodhouse Envelope Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API