Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Kansas v. Nixon

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 1, 2007No. SC 87321PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Planned Parenthood 1 appeals the Jackson County Circuit Court’s determination that section 188.250, RSMo Supp.2005, is constitutional as construed by the circuit court.

Section 188.250 2 creates a civil cause of action against any person who intentionally causes, aids or assists a minor in obtaining an abortion without parental consent or appropriate court order allowing for a judicial bypass of the consent requirement under section 188.028, RSMo Supp.2005.

The circuit court, after a thorough and thoughtful analysis, gave section 188.250 a narrowed construction, holding that the statute “cannot…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Schweich v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. State Ex Rel. Poucher v. VincentSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API