Legal Opinion
State v. Worsham
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 8, 1992No. 90-1047-C-1; CA A66436PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*172EDMONDS, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. We affirm.
Defendant contends that the affidavit in support of the warrant does not establish probable cause to search his residence. The information in the affidavit supporting the warrant came from a confidential reliable informant (CRI) who, in turn, had obtained his information from another unnamed person. The affidavit said:
“On March 20, 1990, the CRI informed me that an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. AlvarezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BrothertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. ChezemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. Kapsalis/ScrogginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. Cotter/RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.