Legal Opinion

State v. Cotter/Ray

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 1993No. 90C20234 90C20235 CA A72255 (Control), CA A72256PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Defendants were convicted of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. In this consolidated appeal, they assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant for their home. We reverse.

Defendants argue that the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not establish probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime would be found at their home. The affidavit described a cocaine distribution network in Salem. A PEN register that police installed on the telephone of a secondary distributor showed that, over the course of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. AlvarezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. Carter/GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PoppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API