State v. Cotter/Ray
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Defendants were convicted of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. In this consolidated appeal, they assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant for their home. We reverse.
Defendants argue that the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not establish probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime would be found at their home. The affidavit described a cocaine distribution network in Salem. A PEN register that police installed on the telephone of a secondary distributor showed that, over the course of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. AlvarezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Carter/GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PoppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995