Legal Opinion

State v. Kapsalis/Scroggins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1993No. 10-91-03853A, 10-91-03853B CA A72494 (Control), CA A72495PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*140DEITS, J.

Defendants were charged with unlawful delivery and unlawful possession and delivery of a controlled substance and endangering the welfare of a minor. ORS 475.992; ORS 163.575. The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion to suppress evidence seized during a search conducted pursuant to a warrant. We reverse and remand.

Officer Swanson applied for a warrant to search defendants’ home at 3920 Marshall Avenue in Eugene on March 15,1991. In the supporting affidavit, Swanson recited his training and experience in drug investigations and reported that, on March…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. AlvarezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BostwickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. Kapsalis/ScrogginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. TraxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. TraxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API