Legal Opinion
O. A. Cargill v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1967No. 8566PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was indicted on three counts for perjury, was convicted by a jury, and takes this appeal. The charges stemmed from his answers to questions asked during his appearance before a federal grand jury in’ 1964. In Count I the questions concerned his knowledge of $150,000 withdrawn from Selected Investments Corporation by a Hugh A. Carroll; in Count II his knowledge of a person named “Pierre Laval” or of a story about him; and in Count III appellant is charged with falsely denying having any financial transactions with Justices of the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
Considering…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Hyman WinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Harold Hanger v. United States of America, Gale Mixen v. United States of America, Loretta Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Daniel Nelson SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. William Fred PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.