Legal Opinion

State v. Bernier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 8, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

The Defendant, Paul G. Bernier, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in Superior Court, Oxford County, upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of trafficking in hashish, a schedule X drug, in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (1983). On appeal, he contends that at his trial certain opening remarks by the prosecutor concerning inadmissible hearsay evidence deprived him of a fair trial; and that the presiding justice erred (a) in refusing to permit defense counsel to conduct the jury voir dire pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 1258-A (1980) and (b) in stipulating as a condition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. NorthupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. State v. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. State v. ColomySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. State v. RancourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. JOHN A. LUCHSINGER, PCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. State v. BowmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. State v. CollinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. State v. DubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. State v. RaineySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API