State v. Colomy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
Kenneth Colomy and Michael Fisher were separately indicted for aggravated assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208(1)(A). Since both offenses could have been joined in a single indictment, the State filed a motion for joinder, and a justice of the Superior Court ordered that the cases be “joined for trial purposes.” Rule 13, M.R.Crim.P. Following a jury trial of the conjoined indictments each defendant was found guilty, judgments of conviction were entered, and each defendant has appealed. We deny both appeals.
Defendant Fisher premised his appeal on six points. Defendant Colomy adopted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- State v. PullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Commonwealth v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- State v. RichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. ThurlowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. WalshSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. FlemmingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.