Legal Opinion

Moore v. JOHN A. LUCHSINGER, PC

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 2004PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 The trial judge denied a motion by Plaintiff Thomas P. Moore to strike and remove a non pros for failing to file a timely certificate of merit or petition to extend the time for filing. See Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3. The non pros was entered against Moore by defendants, John A. Luchsinger, P.C. and John A. Luchsinger, Esquire (“Luchsinger”). See Pa.R.C.P. 1042.6. 1 We reverse and remand for a hearing to determine when the praecipe should be deemed filed. 2

¶ 2 Moore filed a legal malpractice case against the attorney and law firm that represented him as administrator of an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Hoover v. DavilaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Nagy v. Best Home Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Koken v. LedermanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Velazquez v. UPMC Bedford Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Liggon-Redding v. Estate of Robert SugarmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Stroud v. Abington Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Warner v. University of Pennsylvania Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. White v. Behlke, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2004
  5. Abdullah v. Mead Johnson & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API