Legal Opinion

Mintzer v. Turnbach

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1934No. Appeal 30PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiffs in this equity proceeding complained of the action of the board of supervisors of the town ship of Sugarloaf, in levying a certain millage for township purposes, and in adopting as the basis thereof valuations fixed in 1931, disregarding a subsequent adjustment made on or about the first of March, 1932, which resulted in reducing the valuation of plaintiffs’ properties below the 1931 valuation; and prayed:

“(1) That an injunction shall issue, temporary until hearing, and perpetual thereafter, enjoining and restraining the defendants ...... from ......…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. KnappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Baur v. Wilkes-Barre Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Borough of Summerhill v. SherbineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Juniata Water & Water Power Co. v. Wilson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Surco Products, Inc. v. KieszekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Zeigenfuse v. BoltzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Afro-American Life Insurance v. LaBerthSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Mervine v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API