Legal Opinion

Surco Products, Inc. v. Kieszek

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1951No. Appeals, 104 to 108PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

A Bill in Equity was filed on February 9, 1951, alleging a conspiracy and notifying defendants that an application for a temporary injunction would be presented to the court on February 15, 1951. The hear ing was continued until February 16th and on that date the court, after hearing some testimony, granted a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from doing any business until February; 21, 1951, at which time another hearing was to be held to determine a further order of the court. The preliminary injunction was ordered without requiring any bond or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie & North-East Railroad v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Kincaid's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Cassidy v. KnappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Baur v. Wilkes-Barre Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Appeal of GilroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. City Line Open Hearth, Inc. v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Mamula v. UNITED STEELWORKERS of A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Roth v. Columbia Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Terrizzi Beverage Co. v. Local Union No. 830Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API