Legal Opinion

Firth v. Firth

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On ex parte hearing on petition, master’s report and proofs •taken before a master.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

This is a suit for divorce by a husband against his wife for .adultery. The crime charged has been proved. If the only question presented was whether or not the defendant’s guilt had been established, the case could very easily be decided. But it presents another and much more troublesome query, namely: Had the petitioner, when he brought his suit, a right to sue for a divorce in this state? or, stated in another form, Has this court power, on the facts of the case as they appear in the proofs, to dissolve his marriage with the defendant ? The decisive question of the case is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Weld v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re MichelsohnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1944
  2. In Re SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1945
  3. In Re HarrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API