Legal Opinion

In Re Michelsohn

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 28, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This controversy involves two appeals from two orders or decrees of the Monmouth County Orphans Court.

The first is an appeal of Harold Love, executor of the will of Mamie Michelsohn, deceased, who was the widow of testator and the caveatrix in this proceeding, from a decree of the Monmouth County Orphans Court admitting to probate the last will and testament of Solomon Michelsohn, deceased. During the course of the proceedings in the Orphans Court, the caveatrix died and this appellant was substituted as caveator.

The second is an appeal by the executors of the testator from that part of an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Watkinson v. WatkinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  3. In Re DorranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1934
  4. Rinaldi v. RinaldiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  5. Harral v. HarralSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gates v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. Cromwell v. NeeldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Continos v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Rosenberg v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. In re the Settlement of the Accounts of UnanueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API