Legal Opinion

Ruhl v. Ruhl

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1884PublishedCited by 34 opinions

The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, Judge:

This suit was pending in the municipal court of "Wheeling prior to and on the 9th day of February, 1878, and on that day said court entered a decree therein confirming the report and.sale of certain real estate made by Dennis O’Keeffe special commissioner, in pursuance of a former decree in the cause and directing said commissioner to withdraw the sale bonds for the deferred payments and collect the same as they should become due, “and that, after paying costs which may hereafter accrue in this cause out of the proceeds thereof, to pay the l'esidue in equal parts to the said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yates v. LansingCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1811
  2. Nicholas v. KershnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hinckley v. Gilman, Clinton, & Springfield RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. State ex rel. Mason v. Harper's Ferry Bridge Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Swinburn v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. FredlockWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State Ex Rel. Robinson v. MichaelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Morgan v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Smith v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API