Legal Opinion
Berry v. Crown Equipment Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 16, 2000No. 2:99-cv-73530PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Lasandra Berry was injured while driving a stand-up forklift manufac tured by Defendant Crown Equipment Corporation. In her Amended Complaint, Plaintiff claims that the forklift she was driving (the “Crown 35RRTT”) was defectively designed and alleges as theories of recovery breach of implied warranties (Count I) and negligence (Count II).
This action is presently before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has responded to Defendant’s Motion. Having…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Coffey v. Dowley Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2002
- Hilaire v. DeWalt Industrial Tool Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Lara v. Delta International Machinery Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Olson v. Home DepotDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Jacobs v. Tricam Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.