Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 23, 1947No. 9416PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINTON, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us on the sufficiency of the amended complaint. The District Court sustained the defendants’ motion to dismiss, and the plaintiffs have appealed. We look only to the allegations of fact in the amended complaint in order to determine its sufficiency. The following essential facts are alleged.
The plaintiff Floyd Daniel is a citizen of Texas. The plaintiffs Universal Mills and Union National Mill are corporations of Texas and Ohio, respectively. Miller B. Harrison and William C. Harrison are partners doing business under the name of R. L. Harrison & Son,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Kohler v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Perrott v. United States Banking CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- United States v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Anderson v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Anthony J. Bosco v. Robert B. SerhantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,244 Axelrod & Co. v. Kordich, Victor & NeufeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- American Agriculture Movement, Incorporated v. The Board Of Trade Of The City Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.