Legal Opinion

Van Domelon v. Industeial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Plaintiff contends that the judgment appealed from is not appealable; that it is in effect merely an intermediate order which neither determined the action, nor prevented a judgment from which an appeal might be taken by defendants. That contention is erroneous. The judgment was entered in an action which is authorized by sec. 102.23, Stats., for the review of an order or award of the Industrial Commission. That statute provides that upon the hearing “the court may confirm or set aside such order or award;” and also that “The record in any case shall be transmitted to the commission within…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kangas's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Matter of Bloomfield v. . NovemberNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Pfister & Vogel Leather Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ogletree v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Johnstown Coal & Coke Co. v. DishongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Big Savage Refractories Corp. v. GearyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Magelo v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Bearns v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API