Legal Opinion

Moore v. State ex rel. Clegg

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7181PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— Three persons were charged with a misdemeanor, and prosecuted by the State upon the charge, be*359fore the appellant as a justice of the peace. The case was tried by a jury, and a verdict returned finding the defendants guilty, and assessing the fine of each at fifteen dollars. On the motion of the defendants in said prosecution, the justice granted a new trial. The relator applied for a writ of mandate to compel the justice to enter judgment on the-, verdict of the jury, and an alternative writ issued.

In his return to the alternative writ, the appellant sets out. the proceedings had before him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. State ex rel. ReadIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Allen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. State v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Steel v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Corthell v. MeadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Welch v. State, ex rel. BeauchampIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Pritchett v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State ex rel. Hamilton v. EngleIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API