Legal Opinion

LE Talcott & Sons, Inc. v. Aurora Corporation

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 1, 1959No. Civ. A. 2022PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

This was a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted, the motion being based on the Statute of Limitations. 1

The facts must be largely ascertained from the complaint alone.

It is alleged Aurora Corporation, the defendant (formerly Dearborn Motors Corporation), prior to January 22, 1953, “sold and/or consigned” to the plaintiff, L. E. Talcott & Sons, Incorporated (then doing business under the corporate title of The Nicoll Talcott Corporation), “A ‘Dearborn’ Tractor and Loader”; 2 that on or about January 22,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Gaffney v. Unit Crane and Shovel Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1955
  3. Tomko v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
  4. Tevington v. International Milling Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1945

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Colonial Refrigerated TransPortation, Inc. v. WorshamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. Raymond-Dravo-Langenfelder v. Microdot, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  3. Southern Coal and Coke Co. v. Beech Grove Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  4. In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  5. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API