LE Talcott & Sons, Inc. v. Aurora Corporation
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This was a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted, the motion being based on the Statute of Limitations. 1
The facts must be largely ascertained from the complaint alone.
It is alleged Aurora Corporation, the defendant (formerly Dearborn Motors Corporation), prior to January 22, 1953, “sold and/or consigned” to the plaintiff, L. E. Talcott & Sons, Incorporated (then doing business under the corporate title of The Nicoll Talcott Corporation), “A ‘Dearborn’ Tractor and Loader”; 2 that on or about January 22,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Gaffney v. Unit Crane and Shovel Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1955
- Tomko v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
- Tevington v. International Milling Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1945
3Cited by15 opinions
- Colonial Refrigerated TransPortation, Inc. v. WorshamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Raymond-Dravo-Langenfelder v. Microdot, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Southern Coal and Coke Co. v. Beech Grove Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
- In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.