Legal Opinion

Gaffney v. Unit Crane and Shovel Corp.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 18, 1955No. 140, Civil Action, 1954PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richards, P. J.:

Defendant is the manufacturer of cranes, power shovels and other power driven equipment. It issues a bulletin in which it describes a certain type of truck crane known as “Unit 1520T, Truck Crane”, and represents that this particular type of truck crane, based upon 85 per cent of the tipping load, with a boom length of 35 feet and working radius of 10 feet, has the capacity to lift the weight of 20 tons. It sells this equipment, including the truck crane known as “Unit 1520T Truck Crane”, to various distributors including Stewart Equipment Company of Philadelphia, Inc.

On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lewey v. H. C. Fricke Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  3. Fairbank Canning Co. v. . MetzgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Southern California Enterprises, Inc. v. D. N. & E. Walter & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
  3. Booth Glass Co. v. Huntingfield Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Sorensen v. the Overland CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  5. A. J. Aberman, Inc. v. Funk Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API