Legal Opinion

R & W Flammann Gmbh v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 7, 2003No. 03-5014PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Chief Judge.

The United States appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims enjoining the Department of the Army from awarding a resolicited bid contract. R & W Flammann GmbH v. United States, 53 Fed.Cl. 647 (2002). Because the court erred as a matter of law, we reverse.

Background

In January 2001, the Army awarded Contract No. DAJA02-01-D-0007, the incumbent contract, to R & W Flammann GmbH (“Flammann”) to conduct between occupancy maintenance (“BOM”) services for housing units in Heidelberg, Germany. Awarded in accordance with the sealed bid procurement process, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Students Against Genocide v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. John Davis v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Orion Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Turner Const. Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Dell Federal Systems, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. CHE Consulting, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API