Legal Opinion
CHE Consulting, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 30, 2008No. 2007-5172PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
In this bid protest case, the United States Court of Federal Claims entered judgment in favor of the United States Naval Oceanographic Office (“NAVO”) and against the challenger, CHE Consulting (“CHE”). CHE protested NAVO’s decision to solicit a single provider for the hardware and software maintenance of a complex computer system. During oral argument, the trial court requested NAVO to supplement the administrative record with regard to, inter alia, system maintenance practices of other agencies. Following supplementation, the trial court entered judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Savantage Financial Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Pai Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Blackwater Lodge & Training Center, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.