Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1985No. 84AP-192PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, J.

This matter is before us on the appeal of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (“commission”) from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County finding an order of the commission was not supported by reliable, probative or substantial evidence, and also that, as a matter of law, the city’s minimum uncorrected visual acuity standard for employment of police officers was lawful.

Appellee Janson and two other individuals, all of whom had applied for positions as police officers with the city, had been informed that their names had been removed from the police eligibility list due to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. James D. HODGSON, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cleveland Civil Service Commission v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Markham v. Earle M. Jorgensen Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Cecil v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  4. Monak v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API